Response to Meghan

I agree with Meghan's post in her blog that says that nature is not really wild because scientists have gone in to the depths of the wild that most of man kind would not venture to. This is because they think they can find something out there that can help them develop a new treatment for cancer. Or at least they say that because they could have an ulterior motive. This is because they find new animals that are out there and could potentially  strip the forest of a plant that may cure something other than what they want it to. Any where that man can go man will go. This is because most people want to go somewhere that has been untouched and discover something that makes them famous. So, is the wild really wild?